@article {144, title = {Association of Rare Pathogenic DNA Variants for Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, and Lynch Syndrome With Disease Risk in Adults According to Family History.}, journal = {JAMA Netw Open}, volume = {3}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 04 01}, pages = {e203959}, abstract = {

Importance: Pathogenic DNA variants associated with familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome are widely recognized as clinically important and actionable when identified, leading some clinicians to recommend population-wide genomic screening.

Objectives: To assess the prevalence and clinical importance of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with each of 3 genomic conditions (familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome) within the context of contemporary clinical care.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used gene-sequencing data from 49 738 participants in the UK Biobank who were recruited from 22 sites across the UK between March 21, 2006, and October 1, 2010. Inpatient hospital data date back to 1977; cancer registry data, to 1957; and death registry data, to 2006. Statistical analysis was performed from July 22, 2019, to November 15, 2019.

Exposures: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic DNA variants classified by a clinical laboratory geneticist.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite end point specific to each genomic condition based on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events for familial hypercholesterolemia, breast or ovarian cancer for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and colorectal or uterine cancer for Lynch syndrome.

Results: Among 49 738 participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [8] years; 27 144 female [55\%]), 441 (0.9\%) harbored a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant associated with any of 3 genomic conditions, including 131 (0.3\%) for familial hypercholesterolemia, 235 (0.5\%) for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and 76 (0.2\%) for Lynch syndrome. Presence of these variants was associated with increased risk of disease: for familial hypercholesterolemia, 28 of 131 carriers (21.4\%) vs 4663 of 49 607 noncarriers (9.4\%) developed atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, 32 of 116 female carriers (27.6\%) vs 2080 of 27 028 female noncarriers (7.7\%) developed associated cancers; and for Lynch syndrome, 17 of 76 carriers (22.4\%) vs 929 of 49 662 noncarriers (1.9\%) developed colorectal or uterine cancer. The predicted probability of disease at age 75 years despite contemporary clinical care was 45.3\% for carriers of familial hypercholesterolemia, 41.1\% for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and 38.3\% for Lynch syndrome. Across the 3 conditions, 39.7\% (175 of 441) of the carriers reported a family history of disease vs 23.2\% (34 517 of 148 772) of noncarriers.

Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that approximately 1\% of the middle-aged adult population in the UK Biobank harbored a pathogenic variant associated with any of 3 genomic conditions. These variants were associated with an increased risk of disease despite contemporary clinical care and were not reliably detected by family history.

}, keywords = {Aged, Cohort Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, Heterozygote, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Male, Middle Aged, Pedigree, Proportional Hazards Models, United Kingdom, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {2574-3805}, doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3959}, author = {Patel, Aniruddh P and Wang, Minxian and Fahed, Akl C and Mason-Suares, Heather and Brockman, Deanna and Pelletier, Renee and Amr, Sami and Machini, Kalotina and Hawley, Megan and Witkowski, Leora and Koch, Christopher and Philippakis, Anthony and Cassa, Christopher A and Ellinor, Patrick T and Kathiresan, Sekar and Ng, Kenney and Lebo, Matthew and Khera, Amit V} } @article {105, title = {Polygenic background modifies penetrance of monogenic variants for tier 1 genomic conditions.}, journal = {Nat Commun}, volume = {11}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08 20}, pages = {3635}, abstract = {

Genetic variation can predispose to disease both through (i) monogenic risk variants that disrupt a physiologic pathway with large effect on disease and (ii) polygenic risk that involves many variants of small effect in different pathways. Few studies have explored the interplay between monogenic and polygenic risk. Here, we study 80,928 individuals to examine whether polygenic background can modify penetrance of disease in tier 1 genomic conditions - familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and Lynch syndrome. Among carriers of a monogenic risk variant, we estimate substantial gradients in disease risk based on polygenic background - the probability of disease by age 75 years ranged from 17\% to 78\% for coronary artery disease, 13\% to 76\% for breast cancer, and 11\% to 80\% for colon cancer. We propose that accounting for polygenic background is likely to increase accuracy of risk estimation for individuals who inherit a monogenic risk variant.

}, keywords = {Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome, Human, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multifactorial Inheritance, Odds Ratio, Penetrance, Risk Factors}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-020-17374-3}, author = {Fahed, Akl C and Wang, Minxian and Homburger, Julian R and Patel, Aniruddh P and Bick, Alexander G and Neben, Cynthia L and Lai, Carmen and Brockman, Deanna and Philippakis, Anthony and Ellinor, Patrick T and Cassa, Christopher A and Lebo, Matthew and Ng, Kenney and Lander, Eric S and Zhou, Alicia Y and Kathiresan, Sekar and Khera, Amit V} } @article {127, title = {Validation of a Genome-Wide Polygenic~Score for Coronary Artery~Disease in~South Asians.}, journal = {J Am Coll Cardiol}, volume = {76}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08 11}, pages = {703-714}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide polygenic scores (GPS) integrate information from many common DNA variants into a single number. Because rates of coronary artery disease (CAD) are substantially higher among South Asians, a GPS to identify high-risk individuals may be particularly useful in this population.

OBJECTIVES: This analysis used summary statistics from a prior genome-wide association study to derive a new GPS for South Asians.

METHODS: This GPS was validated in 7,244 South Asian UK Biobank participants and tested in 491 individuals from a case-control study in Bangladesh. Next, a static ancestry and GPS reference distribution was built using whole-genome sequencing from 1,522 Indian individuals, and a framework was tested for projecting individuals onto this static ancestry and GPS reference distribution using 1,800 CAD cases and 1,163 control subjects newly recruited in India.

RESULTS: The GPS, containing 6,630,150 common DNA variants, had an odds ratio (OR) per SD of 1.58 in South Asian UK Biobank participants and 1.60 in the Bangladeshi study (p~<~0.001 for each). Next, individuals of the Indian case-control study were projected onto static reference distributions, observing an OR/SD of 1.66 (p~<~0.001). Compared with the middle quintile, risk for CAD was most pronounced for those in the top 5\% of the GPS distribution-ORs of 4.16, 2.46, and 3.22 in the South Asian UK Biobank, Bangladeshi, and Indian studies, respectively (p~<~0.05 for each).

CONCLUSIONS: The new GPS has been developed and tested using 3 distinct South Asian studies, and provides a generalizable framework for ancestry-specific GPS assessment.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Bangladesh, Case-Control Studies, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Multifactorial Inheritance}, issn = {1558-3597}, doi = {10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.024}, author = {Wang, Minxian and Menon, Ramesh and Mishra, Sanghamitra and Patel, Aniruddh P and Chaffin, Mark and Tanneeru, Deepak and Deshmukh, Manjari and Mathew, Oshin and Apte, Sanika and Devanboo, Christina S and Sundaram, Sumathi and Lakshmipathy, Praveena and Murugan, Sakthivel and Sharma, Krishna Kumar and Rajendran, Karthikeyan and Santhosh, Sam and Thachathodiyl, Rajesh and Ahamed, Hisham and Balegadde, Aniketh Vijay and Alexander, Thomas and Swaminathan, Krishnan and Gupta, Rajeev and Mullasari, Ajit S and Sigamani, Alben and Kanchi, Muralidhar and Peterson, Andrew S and Butterworth, Adam S and Danesh, John and Di Angelantonio, Emanuele and Naheed, Aliya and Inouye, Michael and Chowdhury, Rajiv and Vedam, Ramprasad L and Kathiresan, Sekar and Gupta, Ravi and Khera, Amit V} }