@article {95, title = {Combining Imaging and Genetics to Predict Recurrence of Anticoagulation-Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {51}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 07}, pages = {2153-2160}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For survivors of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT)-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (OAT-ICH) who are at high risk for thromboembolism, the benefits of OAT resumption must be weighed against increased risk of recurrent hemorrhagic stroke. The ε2/ε4 alleles of the () gene, MRI-defined cortical superficial siderosis, and cerebral microbleeds are the most potent risk factors for recurrent ICH. We sought to determine whether combining MRI markers and genotype could have clinical impact by identifying ICH survivors in whom the risks of OAT resumption are highest.

METHODS: Joint analysis of data from 2 longitudinal cohort studies of OAT-ICH survivors: (1) MGH-ICH study (Massachusetts General Hospital ICH) and (2) longitudinal component of the ERICH study (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage). We evaluated whether MRI markers and genotype predict ICH recurrence. We then developed and validated a combined -MRI classification scheme to predict ICH recurrence, using Classification and Regression Tree analysis.

RESULTS: Cortical superficial siderosis, cerebral microbleed, and ε2/ε4 variants were independently associated with ICH recurrence after OAT-ICH (all <0.05). Combining genotype and MRI data resulted in improved prediction of ICH recurrence (Harrell C: 0.79 versus 0.55 for clinical data alone, =0.033). In the MGH (training) data set, CSS, cerebral microbleed, and ε2/ε4 stratified likelihood of ICH recurrence into high-, medium-, and low-risk categories. In the ERICH (validation) data set, yearly ICH recurrence rates for high-, medium-, and low-risk individuals were 6.6\%, 2.5\%, and 0.9\%, respectively, with overall area under the curve of 0.91 for prediction of recurrent ICH.

CONCLUSIONS: Combining MRI and genotype stratifies likelihood of ICH recurrence into high, medium, and low risk. If confirmed in prospective studies, this combined -MRI classification scheme may prove useful for selecting individuals for OAT resumption after ICH.

}, keywords = {Aged, Anticoagulants, Apolipoprotein E4, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuroimaging, Recurrence}, issn = {1524-4628}, doi = {10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028310}, author = {Biffi, Alessandro and Urday, Sebastian and Kubiszewski, Patryk and Gilkerson, Lee and Sekar, Padmini and Rodriguez-Torres, Axana and Bettin, Margaret and Charidimou, Andreas and Pasi, Marco and Kourkoulis, Christina and Schwab, Kristin and DiPucchio, Zora and Behymer, Tyler and Osborne, Jennifer and Morgan, Misty and Moomaw, Charles J and James, Michael L and Greenberg, Steven M and Viswanathan, Anand and Gurol, M Edip and Worrall, Bradford B and Testai, Fernando D and McCauley, Jacob L and Falcone, Guido J and Langefeld, Carl D and Anderson, Christopher D and Kamel, Hooman and Woo, Daniel and Sheth, Kevin N and Rosand, Jonathan} } @article {66, title = {Identification and Validation of Hematoma Volume Cutoffs in Spontaneous, Supratentorial Deep Intracerebral Hemorrhage.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {50}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Aug}, pages = {2044-2049}, abstract = {

Background and Purpose- Clinical trials in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have used volume cutoffs as inclusion criteria to select populations in which the effects of interventions are likely to be the greatest. However, optimal volume cutoffs for predicting poor outcome in deep locations (thalamus versus basal ganglia) are unknown. Methods- We conducted a 2-phase study to determine ICH volume cutoffs for poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6) in the thalamus and basal ganglia. Cutoffs with optimal sensitivity and specificity for poor outcome were identified in the ERICH ([Ethnic/Racial Variations of ICH] study; derivation cohort) using receiver operating characteristic curves. The cutoffs were then validated in the ATACH-2 trial (Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage-2) by comparing the c-statistic of regression models for outcome (including dichotomized volume) in the validation cohort. Results- Of the 3000 patients enrolled in ERICH, 1564 (52\%) had deep ICH, of whom 1305 (84\%) had complete neuroimaging and outcome data (660 thalamic and 645 basal ganglia hemorrhages). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 8 mL in thalamic (area under the curve, 0.79; sensitivity, 73\%; specificity, 78\%) and 18 mL in basal ganglia ICH (area under the curve, 0.79; sensitivity, 70\%; specificity, 83\%) as optimal cutoffs for predicting poor outcome. The validation cohort included 834 (84\%) patients with deep ICH and complete neuroimaging data enrolled in ATACH-2 (353 thalamic and 431 basal ganglia hemorrhages). In thalamic ICH, the c-statistic of the multivariable outcome model including dichotomized ICH volume was 0.80 (95\% CI, 0.75-0.85) in the validation cohort. For basal ganglia ICH, the c-statistic was 0.81 (95\% CI, 0.76-0.85) in the validation cohort. Conclusions- Optimal hematoma volume cutoffs for predicting poor outcome in deep ICH vary by the specific deep brain nucleus involved. Utilization of location-specific volume cutoffs may improve clinical trial design by targeting deep ICH patients that will obtain maximal benefit from candidate therapies.

}, issn = {1524-4628}, doi = {10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023851}, author = {Leasure, Audrey C and Sheth, Kevin N and Comeau, Mary and Aldridge, Chad and Worrall, Bradford B and Vashkevich, Anastasia and Rosand, Jonathan and Langefeld, Carl and Moomaw, Charles J and Woo, Daniel and Falcone, Guido J} } @article {44, title = {Cardioembolic Stroke Risk and Recovery After Anticoagulation-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {49}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Nov}, pages = {2652-2658}, abstract = {

Background and Purpose- Whether to resume oral anticoagulation treatment after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains an unresolved question. Previous studies focused primarily on recurrent stroke after ICH. We sought to investigate the association between cardioembolic stroke risk, oral anticoagulation therapy resumption, and functional recovery among ICH survivors in the absence of recurrent stroke. Methods- We conducted a joint analysis of 3 observational studies: (1) the multicenter RETRACE study (German-Wide Multicenter Analysis of Oral Anticoagulation Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage); (2) the Massachusetts General Hospital ICH study (n=166); and (3) the ERICH study (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage; n=131). We included 941 survivors of ICH in the setting of active oral anticoagulation therapy for prevention of cardioembolic stroke because of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and without evidence of ischemic stroke and recurrent ICH at 1 year from the index event. We created univariable and multivariable models to explore associations between cardioembolic stroke risk (based on CHADS-VASc scores) and functional recovery after ICH, defined as achieving modified Rankin Scale score of <=3 at 1 year for participants with modified Rankin Scale score of >3 at discharge. Results- In multivariable analyses, the CHADS-VASc score was associated with a decreased likelihood of functional recovery (odds ratio, 0.83 per 1 point increase; 95\% CI, 0.79-0.86) at 1 year. Anticoagulation resumption was independently associated with a higher likelihood of recovery, regardless of CHADS-VASc score (odds ratio, 1.89; 95\% CI, 1.32-2.70). We found an interaction between CHADS-VASc score and anticoagulation resumption in terms of association with increased likelihood of functional recovery (interaction P=0.011). Conclusions- Increasing cardioembolic stroke risk is associated with a decreased likelihood of functional recovery at 1 year after ICH, but this association was weaker among participants resuming oral anticoagulation therapy. These findings support, including recovery metrics, in future studies of anticoagulation resumption after ICH.

}, issn = {1524-4628}, doi = {10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021799}, author = {Murphy, Meredith P and Kuramatsu, Joji B and Leasure, Audrey and Falcone, Guido J and Kamel, Hooman and Sansing, Lauren H and Kourkoulis, Christina and Schwab, Kristin and Elm, Jordan J and Gurol, M Edip and Tran, Huy and Greenberg, Steven M and Viswanathan, Anand and Anderson, Christopher D and Schwab, Stefan and Rosand, Jonathan and Shi, Fu-Dong and Kittner, Steven J and Testai, Fernando D and Woo, Daniel and Langefeld, Carl D and James, Michael L and Koch, Sebastian and Huttner, Hagen B and Biffi, Alessandro and Sheth, Kevin N} }